Detailed Study Notes for Unit I

Detailed Study Notes for Unit I

Unit-I: Corporate Personality, Characteristics, Kinds of Companies, Incorporation & Lifting the Corporate Veil

1. Meaning, Definition, and Nature of a Company

A. Statutory Definition

  • Definition under Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013: A “company” means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law (such as the Companies Act, 1956).
  • Legal Person Status: A company is an artificial legal person created by law, possessing a distinct legal personality separate and independent from its members, shareholders, and directors.
  • Perpetual Succession: Members may come and go, but the company continues to exist indefinitely until it is legally wound up or dissolved, unaffected by the death, insolvency, or retirement of its members.
  • Common Seal: Traditionally served as the official signature of the corporate body (though made optional by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015).
  • Capacity to Sue and Be Sued: Being a legal person, a company can own property in its own name, enter into binding contracts, sue others, and be sued in its corporate name.

B. Classic Case Law Affirming Corporate Personality

  • Case Authority: Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. [1897] AC 22.
  • Facts: Mr. Salomon incorporated a leather business into a limited company, holding nearly all shares and debentures himself, with family members holding nominal shares. The business later went into liquidation, and unsecured creditors argued that the company was a mere sham or agent of Salomon.
  • House of Lords Ruling: The House of Lords held that once a company is legally incorporated, it is a completely separate legal entity independent from its creator, even if one person controls all shares. Salomon was treated as a secured creditor alongside outside creditors.

2. Characteristics of a Company

  • Independent Corporate Existence: The company has rights, obligations, and liabilities distinct from its human members.
  • Limited Liability: The liability of members is limited by shares (to the unpaid amount on their shares) or by guarantee (to the agreed guarantee amount), protecting personal assets from business debts.
  • Transferability of Shares: Shares in a public company are freely transferable in the open market, providing liquidity to investors.
  • Separation of Ownership and Management: Shareholders own the company, but day-to-day management is vested in a Board of Directors elected by shareholders.
  • Contractual Capacity: A company possesses full contractual capacity to acquire, hold, and dispose of movable and immovable property.

3. Kinds of Companies

  1. Public Company (Section 2(71)): A company which is not a private company, has a minimum paid-up capital as prescribed, and has no restrictions on the transfer of its shares. (Minimum 7 members, no maximum limit).
  2. Private Company (Section 2(68)): A company having a minimum paid-up share capital which restricts the right to transfer its shares, limits the number of its members to 200 (excluding employee-shareholders), and prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for securities. (Minimum 2 members).
  3. One Person Company (OPC – Section 2(62)): A private company that has only one person as a member, introduced under the Companies Act, 2013 to encourage solo entrepreneurship with limited liability.
  4. Company Limited by Shares vs. Guarantee: Companies where member liability is limited by the nominal value of shares held versus companies where members undertake to contribute a specified guarantee amount upon winding up.
  5. Holding and Subsidiary Companies (Sections 2(46) and 2(87)): A company is a subsidiary of another if the holding company controls the composition of its Board of Directors or holds more than 50% of its total voting power.

4. Registration and Incorporation of a Company (Chapter II, Companies Act, 2013)

  • Step 1: Name Approval: Application to the Registrar of Companies (ROC) via the RUN (Reserve Unique Name) or SPICe+ web portal.
  • Step 2: Preparation of Charter Documents: Drafting the Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA).
  • Step 3: Filing Incorporation Forms: Submitting SPICe+ (Simplified Performa for Incorporating Company electronically) with PAN, TAN, and EPFO/ESIC registrations.
  • Step 4: Issuance of Certificate of Incorporation (Section 7): Upon verification, the ROC issues a Certificate of Incorporation containing a unique Corporate Identity Number (CIN), marking the legal birth of the company.
  • Conclusive Evidence of Incorporation: Under Section 7(7), once the Certificate of Incorporation is issued, it is conclusive evidence that all procedural requirements of registration have been complied with.

5. Doctrine of Lifting the Corporate Veil

A. Meaning and Concept

  • Normally, courts respect the separate legal entity of a company (Salomon rule). However, when the corporate form is abused for fraud, tax evasion, or illegal activities, the courts or legislature can “lift the corporate veil” to look behind the artificial corporate facade and hold the real human controllers personally liable.

B. Statutory and Judicial Grounds for Lifting the Veil

  1. Reduction of Membership Below Statutory Minimum (Section 3A): If a company carries on business with fewer than 7 members (public) or 2 members (private) for more than 6 months, remaining members become personally liable for debts contracted during that period.
  2. Misdescription of Name (Section 12): Officers signing bills of exchange or promissory notes without explicitly stating the company’s official name may incur personal liability.
  3. Fraudulent Trading / Investigation (Section 339): Conduct of business with intent to defraud creditors.
  4. Judicial Exceptions (Case Law):
    • Protection of Revenue / Tax Evasion: (e.g., Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit Case).
    • Company Acting as an Agent or Trustee for its shareholders.
    • Determination of Enemy Character during wartime (e.g., Continental Tyre Co. v. Daimler Co.).

6. Company Distinguished from Partnership, HUF, and LLP

Feature / DimensionJoint Stock CompanyPartnership FirmHindu Undivided Family (HUF)Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)
Governing StatuteCompanies Act, 2013Indian Partnership Act, 1932Hindu Law & Income Tax ActLLP Act, 2008
Legal PersonalityDistinct legal entity separate from members.No separate legal entity apart from partners.Not a distinct legal entity separate from coparceners.Distinct corporate body separate from partners.
Liability of MembersLimited to unpaid share capital or guarantee.Unlimited joint and several liability.Unlimited liability for Karta; limited for coparceners.Limited to agreed contribution of partners.
Perpetual SuccessionContinuous existence unaffected by member changes.Dissolved upon death or insolvency of a partner.Continuous family status governed by survivorship.Perpetual succession with separate legal identity.

7. In-Depth Landmark Case Studies

Case Study 1: Separate Legal Entity and Salomon Principle

  • Case Title: Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd.
  • Citation & Court: [1897] AC 22 (House of Lords)
  • Related Legal Principles: Corporate personality, separate legal entity, and limited liability.
  • The Story & Real-Line Background: Mr. Salomon transferred his solvent boot-making business to a limited company consisting of himself, his wife, and five children as shareholders. He took fully paid shares and secured debentures as part purchase price. The business failed due to strikes, and unsecured creditors sued Salomon personally, claiming the company was merely his alter ego.
  • Legal Issues Involved: Whether a registered company with nominal family shareholding is a separate legal person or a mere agent of its controlling shareholder.
  • Final Judgement & Ratio Decidendi:
    • Ruling: The House of Lords held that the company was validly incorporated. Once the statutory requirements of registration are fulfilled, a company is a real, independent legal person. Salomon’s secured debentures took priority over unsecured creditors.
    • Ratio: A company is an independent legal entity distinct from its members, establishing the cornerstone of modern corporate law.

Case Study 2: Lifting the Corporate Veil to Prevent Tax Evasion

  • Case Title: Re Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit
  • Citation & Court: AIR 1927 Bom 371 (Bombay High Court)
  • Related Legal Principles: Lifting the corporate veil, sham companies, and tax evasion.
  • The Story & Real-Line Background: A wealthy taxpayer earned massive dividend and interest income, incurring heavy personal income tax. To evade high tax liability, he formed four dummy private companies, transferred his investments to them, and received loans from them which he claimed were non-taxable.
  • Legal Issues Involved: Whether courts can lift the corporate veil when a company is incorporated solely as a sham to evade tax obligations.
  • Final Judgement & Ratio Decidendi:
    • Ruling: The Bombay High Court held that the four companies were mere shams created solely to avoid tax. The court lifted the corporate veil to look at the economic reality, ruling that the dividend income remained the assessee’s personal income.
    • Ratio: Courts will pierce the corporate veil if a company is formed or used as a legal facade or sham for tax evasion or fraud.

Quick Reference Guide: Unit-I Company Law

Unit NumberTopic / Concept NameCore Statutory ProvisionCore Description / Subject Matter
Unit-IDefinition of CompanySection 2(20), Act of 2013Artificial legal person incorporated under company law with perpetual succession.
Unit-ISeparate Legal EntitySalomon CaseCompany possesses independent existence distinct from its shareholders and directors.
Unit-IPrivate vs. Public CompanySections 2(68) & 2(71)Distinction based on transferability of shares, member limits, and public invitations.
Unit-ILifting the Corporate VeilJudicial & Statutory ExceptionsPiercing the corporate facade to penalize fraud, tax evasion, or statutory evasion.